
Winter/Spring 1992
Community Policing and Cultural Change: An Officer's View
by Officer Wayne Kuechler, Portland Police Bureau
In 1990, the Portland Police Bureau and the City of Portland adopted the
"Community Policing Transition Plan," whose objective is to make the transition
to a "department-wide" Community Policing philosophy over the next five
years. Now, a little more than one year into the transition, it has become
apparent that the most difficult part is changing the way officers approach
their jobs.
This resistance to change may be one of the determining reasons for
adopting a smaller "project-oriented" approach like those employed by other
departments (such as the Experimental Policing District in Madison, WI;
Police Area Response in Aurora, CO; and Foot Patrol Districts in Baltimore
County, MD). In these examples officers volunteer to participate and are
not likely to resist the modification of duties and responsibilities due
to a high degree of ownership in the programs. But where these programs
may be successful in one area of town or within a small group of involved
officers, this encourages a separatist view by other uninvolved officers.
Total involvement
Portland was the first major city in the U.S. to involve all employees
in the implementation of Community Policing. All employees have been trained
on basic components of Community Policing and in problem-solving skills
like those employed in Newport News, VA, and San Diego, CA. Many officers
have taken this training and have solved neighborhood problems ranging
from vandalism to drug dealing. The officers who have put the philosophy
and the training into action have accepted the idea that what they are
doing now is more like the original intent of law enforcement. They also
realize that there is a great amount of similarity with what they have
tried to do all along. As one of the officers said at a recent community
meeting, "What I do now isn't that different...I'm doing what I've always
done, but I'm able to get more done because of the involvement of the citizens."
These officers have welcomed this approach to policing where the residents
of a community take an active role with the police in solving its problems.
Resistance within the ranks
Portland's Community Officers have reaped the benefits of success through
the praise of citizens, political leaders, and police officials. However,
their peers have not always been supportive of Community Policing. The
longstanding police culture that exists within law enforcement agencies
often focuses on the failures of Community Policing rather than the successes,
and conflicts develop. These may even take the form of teasing, direct
ridicule, and group exclusion.
Within Portland, a strong union has existed for many years. Although
the union and its long-time president have worked hard to receive an excellent
pay and benefit package, it has also reinforced that all officers get the
same pay, regardless of how productive they may be. The union president
has stated several times that Portland cannot do Community Policing until
we have 300 to 400 more officers. These kind of statements have served
to reinforce the cultural belief that we don't have enough police to do
good police work, let alone Community Policing. Yet the ideas behind Community
Policing are still valid regardless of how many police you have. As Portland's
Chief has told his officers, "You still have to do some kind of police
work, why not do the most effective police work possible, Community Policing?"
Despite the resistance, there are many examples of the success and effectiveness
of Community Policing, in Portland and throughout the U.S. and Canada.
Hopefully, as these successes increase and more officers become involved,
the culture will be modified and peer influence will reinforce the effective
application of Community Policing.
Managing Change
Many within law enforcement resist any change. At a recent in-service training,
an officer made the comment that he thought he was going to be told that
what he had done for many years was wrong. This is not the case. Rather
than to admonish and abandon tradition, Community Policing seeks to expand
the reach of traditional law enforcement and is not a replacement, but
rather an enhancement, of the system in place. Law enforcement will always
have the responsibility to protect life and property, and it will still
be counted on for immediate interdiction in crisis situations.
As law enforcement seeks to improve the service we provide to the taxpayers
of our communities, the question is not whether to change but how that
change will take place. Most strategies for change fall into either the
project- oriented model or, as in Portland, the department-wide model.
Cultural resistance will exist regardless of the model chosen. The project-oriented
approach may reinforce the idea that Community Policing is different from
"real police work" because only some officers are involved. The uninvolved
officers are left to develop their own perceptions of Community Policing.
The department-wide approach is far more difficult to implement, but seeks
to break down the cultural resistance by reinforcing that Community Policing
is "real police work" and that all officers can do Community Policing.
A project-oriented model may show faster, short-term results, but a department-
wide model seeks long-term change and lasting results.
Any change is difficult to implement, particularly so with the cultural
resistance that exists in law enforcement. Departments that plan to make
the transition to Community Policing should be prepared for resistance
and a few mistakes along the way. The foundation for change should include
all employees, and the goal should be to break down the cultural resistance.
When an effective strategy overcoming the resistance is developed and maintained,
the change will have an opportunity to occur.
Below are some suggestions to follow when making a department-wide change
to Community Policing:
-
Involve everyone - If Community Policing is a valid approach, then it's
good for everyone in the agency. Don't send the message that Community
Policing is something special that only a select few can do. This includes
the involvement of citizen and non-sworn employees as well.
-
Change means enhancement - Reinforce that change doesn't mean that previous
policing efforts were wasted. Traditional skills will still be needed.
Community Policing should enhance the skills that they have already learned.
-
Be patient - Don't expect things to occur overnight and don't mandate immediate
change. It has taken many years for law enforcement agencies to get the
way they are now, and it will take many years to change what is already
in place.
-
Be consistent - Officers look for inconsistencies and use them as justification
for resistance.
-
Don't try to change everything at once - Start at the top and work your
way down. Don't expect officers to change what they do if their superiors
haven't changed.
-
Expect and address resistance - It is normal that change brings resistance,
so be prepared for it and develop unique strategies to address it from
the start.
Community Policing is a very effective approach to solving community problems.
If your agency has not already adopted the Community Policing philosophy,
you may be doing so in the future. The approach you choose can determine
the success and effectiveness of Community Policing in your department.
Planning strategies before making a change may minimize resistance within
your agency and lead to a smoother transition for all.
Officer Wayne Kuechler has worked for the Portland (OR) Police Bureau
for seven years. He is currently assigned to the Community Policing Support
Division and has been a major contributor to Portland's Community Policing
efforts.